Abstract
We introduce a framework for reasoning about the security of computer systems using modal logic. This framework is sufficiently expressive to capture a variety of known security properties, while also being intuitive and independent of syntactic details and enforcement mechanisms. We show how to use our formalism to represent various progress- and termination-(in)sensitive variants of confidentiality, integrity, robust declas-sification and transparent endorsement, and prove equivalence to standard definitions. The intuitive nature and closeness to semantic reality of our approach allows us to make explicit several hidden assumptions of these definitions, and identify potential issues and subtleties with them, while also holding the promise of formulating cleaner versions and future extension to entirely novel properties.